A Concerned Alumni’s Call for Transparency at the University of the South Pacific

A group of concerned alumni of the University of the South Pacific has expressed their frustration over the institution’s delay in releasing the outcomes of the 98th USP Council meeting. The statement, released earlier this week, described the regional university’s main decision-making body and support staff’s failure to provide timely updates as “totally unacceptable”.

The group’s statement highlighted the importance of transparency in decision-making processes, particularly during times of uncertainty such as when a strike action mandate is active.

The Allegations Against Professor Pal Ahluwalia

Earlier this week, there was speculation that USP Vice-Chancellor and President Professor Pal Ahluwalia had stepped down from his role at the Rarotonga meeting. However, the University of the South Pacific has denied these allegations, stating that the information was “inaccurate”.

The New Visitor to the USP

Despite the uncertainty surrounding Professor Ahluwalia’s position, a new USP Visitor has been appointed. Mr Daniel Fatiaki, former Chief Justice of Fiji and Vanuatu, is an alumnus and Preliminary 2 graduate who brings valuable experience to the role.

The USP Alumni statement also highlighted the appointment of a new Vice-Chancellor as one of the major outcomes of the two-day meeting in the Cook Islands.

Background on the University’s Ownership

The University of the South Pacific is jointly owned by 12 Pacific Island nations. New Zealand and Australia have been major development partners of the institution since its inception in 1968, providing core funding for the university.

The delay in releasing the meeting outcomes has raised concerns among taxpayers and fee-paying students who rely on the university’s transparency to make informed decisions about their investments.

A Call for Transparency

The concerned alumni’s statement emphasizes the need for transparency and accountability within the institution. The USP Alumni Association is urging the University of the South Pacific to provide regular updates on important decisions, particularly during times of uncertainty.

By releasing a clear summary of the major Council decisions, including the appointment of new leaders, the university can demonstrate its commitment to transparency and rebuild trust with stakeholders.

In conclusion, the delay in releasing the outcomes of the 98th USP Council meeting has raised concerns among alumni and taxpayers. The University of the South Pacific must take steps to restore transparency and accountability within the institution, ensuring that all stakeholders are fully informed about important decisions.

By doing so, the university can maintain its position as a leader in higher education in the Pacific region.

The Future of the USP

As the University of the South Pacific moves forward, it is essential to prioritize transparency and accountability. The appointment of new leaders, including Mr Daniel Fatiaki as Visitor, offers an opportunity for the institution to rebuild trust with stakeholders.

Ultimately, the future of the USP hangs in the balance, and its ability to provide quality education and services to Pacific Islanders depends on its commitment to transparency and accountability.

By taking proactive steps to address these concerns, the University of the South Pacific can ensure a brighter future for itself and the communities it serves.